Vaginal Cysts and Masses
Vaginal cysts and masses span benign cystic, benign solid, premalignant, and malignant lesions of the vaginal wall and paravaginal tissues. The vast majority are benign and asymptomatic, with vaginal cysts found in roughly 0.5–1% of women. The most common cystic lesions are Müllerian cysts (34–44%), epidermal inclusion cysts (~23%), and Gartner duct cysts (5–11%); the most common periurethral / anterior-wall masses are urethral diverticula (~40%) and Skene gland cysts (~30%).[1][2][3][4][5] Special attention belongs to masses in women over 40 or those that are fixed, painful, or bleeding — malignancy is rare but must be excluded.
For periurethral cystic masses, see also Urethral Diverticulum. For lichen-sclerosus-related vulvovaginal lesions, see Lichen Sclerosus.
Organizational Framework
| Category | Lesions |
|---|---|
| Embryologic cysts | Müllerian, Gartner duct (mesonephric), Skene gland (paraurethral) |
| Acquired cysts | Epidermal inclusion, endometriotic, Bartholin duct |
| Urologic | Urethral diverticulum, ectopic ureterocele, ectopic ureter |
| Benign solid tumors | Leiomyoma, fibroepithelial stromal polyp, angiomyofibroblastoma, cellular angiofibroma, superficial myofibroblastoma |
| Locally aggressive | Aggressive angiomyxoma |
| Premalignant | Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN / vaginal HSIL) |
| Malignant | Squamous cell carcinoma (85–90%), adenocarcinoma, melanoma, sarcoma, metastatic |
| Iatrogenic / other | Mesh-related, pseudocysts, abscesses |
Part I — Benign Cystic Lesions
Müllerian cysts
- Most common vaginal cyst in modern series (34–44%)[3][4]
- Embryology — paramesonephric (Müllerian) duct remnants; lined by mucus-secreting endocervical-type or ciliated tubal-type epithelium[3][4]
- Location — typically anterolateral vaginal wall
- Presentation — often larger and more symptomatic than other vaginal cysts; pelvic pressure, dyspareunia, palpable mass
- Diagnosis — examination + MRI for anatomy; histology shows mucicarmine-positive columnar lining[2][3][15]
- Management — observation if asymptomatic; excision for symptomatic cysts[2][15]
Gartner duct (mesonephric) cysts
- Embryology — mesonephric (Wolffian) duct remnants; non-mucus-secreting cuboidal/low columnar epithelium[3]
- Prevalence — 5–11% of vaginal cysts (most lesions historically called Gartner duct cysts have mucin and are actually Müllerian)[3][4]
- Location — anterolateral vaginal wall along the mesonephric remnant[16][17]
- Presentation — most are small and asymptomatic (38%); when symptomatic: dyspareunia (38%), pelvic pain/pressure (24%), palpable bulge (17%), urinary symptoms (7%); mean size 3.5 cm[18]
- Diagnostic pitfall: large Gartner duct cysts can mimic anterior compartment prolapse (cystocele) — consider the diagnosis when prolapse compartments don't add up[5][16]
- Associated GU anomalies in 10–21% — ipsilateral renal agenesis, uterine didelphys, septate vagina, urethral diverticulum, ectopic ureter; reflects shared mesonephric origin[9][17][18]
- Workup — exam + transvaginal US (most common); MRI for complex / large lesions or to exclude urologic involvement[16][18]
| Approach | Notes |
|---|---|
| Observation | Asymptomatic |
| Excision | Most common (54%); lowest recurrence (~8%) |
| Marsupialization | Alternative for large cysts; no recurrence in one review |
| Tetracycline sclerotherapy after aspiration | 7% recurrence |
| Unroofing / partial excision | No recurrence reported |
| Fluorescein dye-assisted excision | Intracystic fluorescein delineates walls and confirms absence of urologic communication[17] |
Median follow-up 82 mo: only 1 possible recurrence (3.4%) after excision; no intraoperative complications.[18]
Epidermal inclusion (squamous inclusion) cysts
- Second most common vaginal cyst (~23%)[4]
- Etiology — acquired; squamous epithelium implanted at episiotomy, vaginal laceration, or prior surgery[3][4]
- Location — posterior or lateral vaginal wall, often at episiotomy scars
- Histology — keratinizing stratified squamous epithelium with keratinous debris
- Management — observation; simple excision if symptomatic; no malignant potential[2][3]
Bartholin duct cysts and abscesses
- Anatomy — Bartholin glands at posterolateral introitus (4 and 8 o'clock)[19]
- Lifetime prevalence ~2% of women[19]
- Pathophysiology — ductal obstruction → cyst; secondary infection → abscess
Management — no single technique is clearly superior; healing and recurrence are similar across fistulization, marsupialization, and sclerotherapy.[19][20]
| Technique | Notes |
|---|---|
| Word catheter | Office-based; 4–6 weeks for fistulization |
| Marsupialization | Permanent drainage tract |
| Silver nitrate sclerotherapy | Alternative fistulization |
| I&D / aspiration alone | Higher recurrence — not first-line |
| Gland excision | Recurrent disease; mandatory consideration in women > 40 to exclude Bartholin gland carcinoma[2][19] |
Skene gland (paraurethral) cysts
- Embryology — Skene glands are homologs of the male prostate; lined by transitional epithelium[21][22][23]
- Location — periurethral, adjacent to the meatus[22][24][25]
- Prevalence — ~30% of periurethral / anterior-wall masses[1]
- Presentation — dyspareunia (40%), recurrent UTI (40%), vaginal mass, voiding dysfunction, urinary spraying[23][25]
- Diagnostic pitfall — frequently mislabeled as Bartholin cyst; the discriminator is location (periurethral vs posterolateral introitus). MRI is essential to differentiate from urethral diverticulum.[24][25]
- Management — surgical excision; cystoscopy to exclude urethral communication; no recurrences in a 10-patient series at mean 3.5 yr[25]
Endometriotic cysts
- ~7% of vaginal cysts[4]
- Location — posterior fornix (most common vaginal endometriosis site) or episiotomy scar[8][4]
- Presentation — cyclical pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, tender nodule that enlarges with menses
- Diagnosis — exam, transvaginal US, MRI for deep infiltrating disease[8]
- Management — excision for symptomatic lesions; hormonal therapy as adjunct
Ectopic ureter / megaureter presenting as a "vaginal cyst"
A rare but important pitfall — an ectopic ureter or congenital megaureter can present as a vaginal-wall cyst with continuous incontinence. MRI is essential. Definitive management may require nephroureterectomy with marsupialization of the distal ureter.[9]
Part II — Benign Solid Vaginal Masses
Benign perivaginal masses account for ~1.6% of urogynecologic surgeries.[6]
Vaginal leiomyoma
- Most common benign solid vaginal tumor; smooth muscle origin[8]
- Painless mass, dyspareunia, urinary symptoms; well-circumscribed, homogeneous on MRI
- Excision for symptomatic lesions
Fibroepithelial stromal polyp
- Benign polypoid lesion of vaginal/vulvar stroma; pedunculated or sessile[10][11]
- Can be large and edematous, mimicking aggressive angiomyxoma — important diagnostic pitfall[26]
- Simple excision is curative
Angiomyofibroblastoma (AMFB)
- Benign mesenchymal tumor of vulvovaginal region; clinically often mistaken for Bartholin cyst[27]
- Well-circumscribed; alternating hypercellular / hypocellular zones with abundant capillary-type vessels; vimentin+, desmin+, variable actin[27][28]
- No recurrence after complete excision — the key distinction from aggressive angiomyxoma[27][29]
Aggressive angiomyxoma (AAM)
- Locally aggressive mesenchymal neoplasm of pelvis/perineum in reproductive-age women (mean ~38 yr)[12][30][31]
- Infiltrative without a true capsule — distinguishes it from AMFB[12][27][29]
- ER+, PR+, desmin+, vimentin+, variable SMA[30][31]
- Recurrence 30–40%, sometimes years to decades after excision[12]
- Essentially no metastatic potential[12][29]
- Management: wide surgical excision (often difficult given infiltrative nature) + GnRH agonists (or SERMs / aromatase inhibitors) as adjuvant hormonal therapy given ER/PR positivity; long-term surveillance is mandatory[12][30][31]
Other rare benign solid tumors
Cellular angiofibroma, superficial (cervicovaginal) myofibroblastoma, mammary-type myofibroblastoma — the genital stromal-tumor family; all benign with low recurrence after excision.[10][11] Vaginal angioma and solitary fibrous tumor are rare and curable by excision.[6]
Part III — Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (VAIN)
Definition and epidemiology
- VAIN is the HPV-related premalignant condition of vaginal squamous epithelium, analogous to CIN and VIN[13][32][14]
- Rare — < 1% of female genital intraepithelial neoplasias[32]
- Terminology: VAIN 1 (LSIL) vs VAIN 2/3 (HSIL)[14]
- Progression to invasive carcinoma ~5% for HSIL (8% in some long-term series)[14][33]
- Mean age at diagnosis ~55 years[34]
Risk factors
HPV (especially HPV 16 and 31), prior CIN/cervical cancer, prior hysterectomy (especially for CIN/cancer — 20–55% of VAIN patients have had prior hysterectomy), immunosuppression (HIV), prior pelvic radiation, smoking.[13][14][33][34][35]
Location: > 80% involve the vaginal vault (post-hysterectomy) or upper vagina.[33]
Management[13][32][33][36][37][38][39]
| Grade / option | Notes |
|---|---|
| VAIN 1 (LSIL) | Observation preferred — spontaneous regression in 81–88% |
| VAIN 2/3 (HSIL) | Active treatment indicated |
| CO₂ laser ablation | Cure 69–90%; recurrence 6–23%; regression declines with repeated treatments (75% → 53% → 27%); rule out invasion before ablation |
| Surgical excision (local; upper vaginectomy) | Mainstay if invasion cannot be excluded; cure ~69%; margins do not reliably predict residual disease |
| Topical imiquimod 5% | Cure 25–98%; HPV clearance 63% (vs 11% laser, 17% observation); useful for multifocal disease |
| Topical 5-fluorouracil | Cure ~46%; multifocal/recurrent and post-radiation patients |
| Brachytherapy | Cure 71–90%; refractory/multifocal disease or poor surgical candidates; reserved due to toxicity |
Recurrence and progression: ~22% of high-grade VAIN recurs after treatment (risk factors: VAIN 3, prior hysterectomy, excisional treatment); ~1.5% progress to invasive carcinoma at median 87 months — long-term surveillance is mandatory.[34][39]
Part IV — Primary Vaginal Cancer
Overview
- Extremely rare (< 1% of female genital cancers)[40][41][42][43][14]
- Histology — squamous cell carcinoma 85–90%; adenocarcinoma; melanoma; sarcoma[41][14]
- HPV-associated (predominantly HPV 16) in most squamous cell carcinomas[14]
- Mean age sixth decade; rising incidence in younger women with high HIV prevalence[41][42]
- Presentation — vaginal bleeding (most common), discharge, palpable mass, dyspareunia, urinary symptoms[42][44]
Treatment (NCCN Guidelines)[14][40]
| Stage | Approach |
|---|---|
| I | Definitive radiation (preferred) — EBRT + brachytherapy ± concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy; surgical resection only when complete excision with negative margins is feasible without excessive morbidity |
| II–IVA | Concurrent chemoradiation (platinum-based) + brachytherapy |
| Surgery | Reserved for cases where complete resection with clear margins avoids the need for adjuvant RT; definitive surgical management is uncommon |
Brachytherapy is a critical component — its addition to EBRT improves survival in stages III–IV.[44]
5-year survival: Stage I 58–84%; Stage II 59–74%; Stage III 67–79%; Stage IV 27–32%.[44][45]
Other rare vaginal malignancies
HPV-associated adenocarcinoma, clear cell carcinoma (historically DES-associated), endometrioid carcinoma, mesonephric adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, adenocarcinoma of Skene-gland origin, adenosarcoma, germ cell tumors.[14]
Part V — Diagnostic Approach
The single most useful diagnostic clue is anatomic location.[2][6][7][8][22]
| Location | Top differentials |
|---|---|
| Anterolateral wall | Müllerian cyst, Gartner duct cyst |
| Periurethral / suburethral | Urethral diverticulum, Skene gland cyst |
| Posterolateral introitus (4–8 o'clock) | Bartholin duct cyst |
| Posterior fornix | Endometriotic cyst |
| Episiotomy scar | Epidermal inclusion cyst |
Workup:
- History — duration, mass sensation, dyspareunia, discharge, voiding dysfunction, incontinence, obstetric history (episiotomy, lacerations), prior pelvic surgery, menstrual cyclicity, age
- Examination — location, mobility, tenderness, consistency (cystic vs solid), fixation
- Transvaginal / transperineal ultrasound — first-line imaging[6][8]
- MRI pelvis — best for complex masses, urethra/bladder/rectum relationships, additional cysts, malignancy exclusion[8][15][16]
- VCUG — if urethral diverticulum suspected[7]
- Cystourethroscopy — mandatory for periurethral masses to exclude urethral communication[6][25]
- Biopsy — solid masses, fixed lesions, women > 40, or any suspicion of malignancy[2]
Management Principles
- Asymptomatic benign cysts — observation with periodic follow-up[2][18]
- Symptomatic benign cysts — surgical excision; marsupialization is an alternative for large Gartner duct or Bartholin cysts[17][18][19]
- Periurethral masses — preoperative MRI + cystoscopy mandatory to differentiate urethral diverticulum from Skene gland cyst (different operations); de novo SUI in 5.6% after excision; preexisting SUI resolves in ~68%[1]
- Solid benign tumors — distinguish AMFB (benign, no recurrence) from AAM (locally aggressive, 30–40% recurrence)[12][27]
- VAIN — low-grade observation; high-grade laser, excision, or topical therapy; long-term surveillance[13][32][39]
- Malignancy — biopsy any suspicious lesion; refer to gynecologic oncology; vaginal cancer is treated predominantly with chemoradiation + brachytherapy[14][40]
Key Principles
- Most vaginal cysts are benign and need no intervention unless symptomatic[2][7]
- Location is the most important diagnostic clue[3][4]
- Gartner duct cysts can mimic cystocele — consider when prolapse compartments are inconsistent[5][16]
- Associated GU anomalies in 10–21% of Gartner duct cysts — image the upper tract[17][18]
- Rule out malignancy — biopsy in women > 40, fixed masses, or those with pain or bleeding; periurethral / anterior-wall mass malignancy rate ~1.6%[1][2]
- MRI is the imaging workhorse for complex vaginal masses[8][15][16]
- Aggressive angiomyxoma is the one benign-appearing vaginal mass with major recurrence risk (30–40%) — wide excision and long-term surveillance[12][31]
References
1. Jacox N, Yao HH, Baverstock R, Trpkov K, Carlson K. "Periurethral and anterior vaginal wall masses: etiology, presentation, and treatment outcomes." Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140(5):778–783. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004956
2. Aldrich ER, Pauls RN. "Benign cysts of the vulva and vagina: a comprehensive review for the gynecologic surgeon." Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2021;76(2):101–107. doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000858
3. Deppisch LM. "Cysts of the vagina: classification and clinical correlations." Obstet Gynecol. 1975;45(6):632–637. doi:10.1097/00006250-197506000-00007
4. Pradhan S, Tobon H. "Vaginal cysts: a clinicopathological study of 41 cases." Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1986;5(1):35–46.
5. Esber A, Radosa MP, Wickel J, et al. "Vaginal cysts: an important differential diagnosis in the anterior compartment." Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;267:280–284. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.422
6. Liaci AL, Boesmueller H, Huebner M, Brucker SY, Reisenauer C. "Perivaginal benign masses: diagnosis and therapy in a series of 66 women." Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(2):367–374. doi:10.1007/s00404-016-4234-3
7. Eilber KS, Raz S. "Benign cystic lesions of the vagina: a literature review." J Urol. 2003;170(3):717–722. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000062543.99821.a2
8. Pulappadi VP, Manchanda S, Dhamija E, Jana M. "Multimodality imaging of diseases of the vagina." Br J Radiol. 2024;97(1155):513–525. doi:10.1093/bjr/tqad052
9. Eubanks AA, Gonzalez HM. "Congenital megaureter presenting in an adult as a vaginal wall cyst." Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):859–861. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001357
10. Schoolmeester JK, Fritchie KJ. "Genital soft tissue tumors." J Cutan Pathol. 2015;42(7):441–451. doi:10.1111/cup.12507
11. Chapel DB, Cipriani NA, Bennett JA. "Mesenchymal lesions of the vulva." Semin Diagn Pathol. 2021;38(1):85–98. doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2020.09.003
12. Dellino M, Magazzino F, Domenici L, et al. "Aggressive angiomyxoma of the lower female genital tract: a review of the MITO Rare Tumors Group." Cancers. 2024;16(7):1375. doi:10.3390/cancers16071375
13. Suchońska B, Ługowski F, Papież M, Ludwin A. "Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) — a retrospective cohort analysis of epidemiology, risk factors, and management in an academic clinical center." J Clin Med. 2025;14(15):5386. doi:10.3390/jcm14155386
14. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology — Vaginal Cancer. Updated 2025-12-04.
15. Wai CY, Corton MM, Miller M, Sailors J, Schaffer JI. "Multiple vaginal wall cysts: diagnosis and surgical management." Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5 Pt 2):1099–1102. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000121827.75677.a4
16. Davidson ERW, Barber MD. "A Gartner duct cyst masquerading as anterior vaginal prolapse." Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):1039–1041. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002315
17. Niu S, Didde RD, Schuchmann JK, Zoorob D. "Gartner's duct cysts: a review of surgical management and a new technique using fluorescein dye." Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(1):55–61. doi:10.1007/s00192-019-04091-9
18. Cope AG, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Famuyide AO, et al. "Clinical manifestations and outcomes in surgically managed Gartner duct cysts." J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(3):473–477. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.003
19. Omole F, Kelsey RC, Phillips K, Cunningham K. "Bartholin duct cyst and gland abscess: office management." Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(12):760–766.
20. Illingworth B, Stocking K, Showell M, Kirk E, Duffy J. "Evaluation of treatments for Bartholin's cyst or abscess: a systematic review." BJOG. 2020;127(6):671–678. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16079
21. Kimbrough HM, Vaughan ED. "Skene's duct cyst in a newborn: case report and review of the literature." J Urol. 1977;117(3):387–388. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)58470-0
22. Zuo SW, Napoe GS. "Evaluation and management of urethral and periurethral masses in women." Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023;35(6):517–524. doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000914
23. Miller EV. "Skene's duct cyst." J Urol. 1984;131(5):966–967. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50732-6
24. Woo I, Birsner ML, Chen CC. "Periurethral cystic mass misdiagnosed: a case report." J Reprod Med. 2014;59(7-8):414–416.
25. Foster J, Lemack G, Zimmern P. "Skene's gland cyst excision." Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(5):817–820. doi:10.1007/s00192-015-2872-9
26. Harkness R, McCluggage WG. "HMGA2 is a useful marker of vulvovaginal aggressive angiomyxoma but may be positive in other mesenchymal lesions at this site." Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2021;40(2):185–189. doi:10.1097/PGP.0000000000000689
27. Fletcher CD, Tsang WY, Fisher C, Lee KC, Chan JK. "Angiomyofibroblastoma of the vulva: a benign neoplasm distinct from aggressive angiomyxoma." Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16(4):373–382. doi:10.1097/00000478-199204000-00006
28. Magro G, Righi A, Caltabiano R, Casorzo L, Michal M. "Vulvovaginal angiomyofibroblastomas: morphologic, immunohistochemical, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for deletion of 13q14 region." Hum Pathol. 2014;45(8):1647–1655. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2014.03.020
29. Granter SR, Nucci MR, Fletcher CD. "Aggressive angiomyxoma: reappraisal of its relationship to angiomyofibroblastoma in a series of 16 cases." Histopathology. 1997;30(1):3–10. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2559.1997.d01-556.x
30. Yu BR, Choi WK, Cho DH, Lee NR. "Aggressive angiomyxoma of the vagina: a case report and literature review." Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(4):e41287. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000041287
31. Qu H, Liu N, Liang H, et al. "Aggressive angiomyxoma of female pelvis and perineum: retrospective study of 17 cases." Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;298:165–170. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.012
32. Rountis A, Pergialiotis V, Tsetsa P, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. "Management options for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia." Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74(11):e13598. doi:10.1111/ijcp.13598
33. Rome RM, England PG. "Management of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: a series of 132 cases with long-term follow-up." Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000;10(5):382–390. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1438.2000.010005382.x
34. Gallio N, Preti M, Boldorini R, et al. "High-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: clinical profile, HPV vaccination status, and treatment outcomes at two Italian referral centers." Vaccines. 2025;13(11):1089. doi:10.3390/vaccines13111089
35. Cho HW, Hong JH, Lee JK. "Detection of high-risk human papillomavirus infection and treatment of high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: a single-institution study." Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;154(2):227–232. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13583
36. Benson C, Brooks J, Dhanireddy S, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. IDSA / Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council; 2025.
37. Freitas G, Costa A. "Non-excisional therapeutic modalities in vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia." Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;284:175–179. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.014
38. Tainio K, Jakobsson M, Louvanto K, et al. "Randomised trial on treatment of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia — imiquimod, laser vaporisation and expectant management." Int J Cancer. 2016;139(10):2353–2358. doi:10.1002/ijc.30275
39. He MY, Yu EL, Hui SK, Kung YLF. "Clinical outcomes of laser vaporization for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia — a 20-year retrospective review." Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;277:101–109. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.017
40. Abu-Rustum NR, Campos SM, Amarnath S, et al. "Vaginal cancer, version 2.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology." J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2026;24(3):101–126. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2026.0011
41. Westerveld H, Nesvacil N, Fokdal L, et al. "Definitive radiotherapy with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for primary vaginal cancer." Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(3):e157–e167. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30855-1
42. Adams TS, Rogers LJ, Cuello MA. "Cancer of the vagina: 2021 update." Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155(Suppl 1):19–27. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13867
43. Expert Panel on GYN and OB Imaging, Kilcoyne A, Gottumukkala RV, et al. "ACR Appropriateness Criteria® staging and follow-up of primary vaginal cancer." J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18(11S):S442–S455. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.011
44. Yang J, Delara R, Magrina J, et al. "Management and outcomes of primary vaginal cancer." Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(2):456–463. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.036
45. Chyle V, Zagars GK, Wheeler JA, Wharton JT, Delclos L. "Definitive radiotherapy for carcinoma of the vagina: outcome and prognostic factors." Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35(5):891–905. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)02394-1