Skip to main content

The Clinical Operator Mindset

Surgical training produces technical expertise. In a September 2012 survey of 48 surgical residents at one program, 6 of 48 (13%) gave positive self-assessments for the "business of medicine" and 9 of 48 (19%) for health care legislation and its effects.[2] This article lays out the mindset shift, core knowledge stack, and learning pathway that closes the gap.

See also: Healthcare Finance & Payment Models, Billing & Coding.

The Reframe​

Most clinicians think:

"I treat patients."

The clinical operator thinks:

"I operate a clinical production system that delivers care."

That shift is the difference between an employee physician and a physician leader, and it is what aligns the interests of the surgeon, the patient, the institution, and the payer. A clinical operator asks three questions about every clinical decision:

  1. What is the outcome for the patient?
  2. What is the cost to the system?
  3. What is the margin / sustainability of delivering this care?

The Three Core Knowledge Domains​

1. Healthcare Finance​

The focus is mechanics.

  • Revenue cycle. Charge to coding to billing to reimbursement to collections
  • Payer mix. Medicare versus private versus Medicaid versus self-pay; the effect on margin
  • RVUs. Work, practice expense, malpractice components; conversion factor
  • Contribution margin. Revenue minus variable cost of each case
  • Cost accounting. Fixed versus variable costs; step costs
  • Facility fee versus professional fee. Who bills what, why they differ

These are covered in depth in Healthcare Finance & Payment Models.

2. Health Systems & Policy​

Where most clinicians are weakest.

  • Payment models. Fee-for-service versus bundled payment versus value-based care
  • CMS incentives and penalties. MIPS, hospital readmissions, value-based purchasing
  • Hospital versus private-practice economics. Why the same operation has wildly different margins in different settings
  • Vertical integration. Why hospital systems buy urology practices
  • Consolidation and antitrust. The shape of the market

Best primary sources:

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The authoritative source for payment rules
  • Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). Policy explainers
  • Health Affairs. Policy-focused journal with practical content
  • Bodenheimer & Grumbach, Understanding Health Policy. Standard reference

3. Operations & Management​

Where the surgeon can actually move the needle.

  • Throughput. OR utilization, clinic flow, turnover time
  • Staffing models. APP deployment, MA ratios, nursing skill mix
  • Lean and process improvement. Value-stream mapping, waste reduction
  • Service-line strategy. Which procedures to build, which to shed
  • Block-time management. How OR time is allocated and defended

Best sources:

  • Goldratt, The Goal. The foundational operations novel
  • Lean for Healthcare (Graban). Healthcare-specific lean
  • Harvard Business School healthcare case studies. Kaiser, HCA, Mayo, Cleveland Clinic
  • AUGS Commentary, "Improving Operating Room Efficiency and Patient Safety" (Napoé and Basinski, Urogynecology 2026). Practical steps for surgeons: grouping similar cases, building consistent teams, maintaining case cards, verification time before incision and structured timeouts and debriefs (doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001802)

Metrics — Learn the Second Language​

MetricWhat it measures
wRVUs per clinic sessionWork output per half-day
wRVUs per OR dayProcedural productivity
Contribution margin per caseRevenue minus variable cost
OR block utilization %How full your block time is (75% was an internal target at one academic hospital)[44]
Clinic no-show rateAccess and scheduling efficiency
Payer mix %Commercial / Medicare / Medicaid / self-pay breakdown
Patient acquisition costCost to acquire a new patient
First-case on-time start %OR operational efficiency
30-day readmission rateQuality metric tied to reimbursement
Net collection rateRevenue actually collected vs charged

Knowledge Gaps Identified in the Literature​

A 2022 qualitative needs assessment of early-career surgeons identified four principal deficits:[1]

  1. Fundamentals of procedural coding, clinical billing, and compliance (a related survey found 6 of 48 residents [13%] positive on the broader "business of medicine" item)[2]
  2. Finding and building a practice (contract negotiation, evaluating job offers, practice-model selection)
  3. Navigating organizational challenges (change management, care-pathway construction, staffing decisions)
  4. Healthcare legislation and policy (9 of 48 residents [19%] positive on healthcare legislation and its effects)[2]

In an uncontrolled pretest/post-test study of MDContent, a web-based curriculum developed by business and surgery experts, 22 of 28 enrolled general and plastic surgery residents completed 11 modules and both tests; mean scores were 59% before and 78% afterward (p = 0.0001). Most completers rated the content well organized and relevant and said it covered material not taught elsewhere.[3] The take-home: this knowledge is learnable, missing by default, and high-leverage when acquired.

Professional Identity and Reputation​

Professional identity formation is the process by which a trainee comes to think, act and feel as a member of the profession. It is shaped by socialization, role models, mentors, experiential learning and tacit knowledge.[4] The process continues after training. The early-career reconstructive surgeon moves from fellow to the person colleagues call for a recurrent stricture, an eroded sling or a radiation fistula, and the operator mindset applies to that transition as much as to finance.

The AUA Young Urologists Committee transition manual asks new urologists to consider a clinical niche, skills their new practice lacks that they can provide (clinical, operative, protocol development, research or leadership), and life and career goals to reassess at least yearly when choosing commitments.[5] The same manual advises against overcommitting, because an unfinished commitment costs more reputation than a declined one.[5]

Mentorship, Sponsorship and Coaching​

The three relationships are often conflated but serve different purposes.

RoleWhat it providesTypical source
MentorAdvice from lived experience in the same field; skill building, goal setting and navigation of a department or society[5][6]Senior urologist or surgeon inside or outside the department
SponsorPublic advocacy by someone with the position and power to advance the protégé: nominations, invitations, committee and leadership appointments[6][7]Society or institutional leader
CoachStructured, client-centered thought partnership that uses inquiry, feedback and accountability to help the client set and reach their own goals; distinct from mentorship and from therapy[5]Trained professional or peer coach

Formal mentoring and executive-coaching programs have not substantially increased the proportion of women in the highest academic leadership positions.[7] Men are more likely to acquire sponsors informally, and those sponsors tend to be men.[6] In a subspecialty society, the sponsor is the person who nominates a junior member for a panel, committee or podium slot. The transition manual notes that such opportunities follow sustained abstract submission and section participation, not fellowship pedigree alone.[5] A practical arrangement is at least one mentor inside the department, one local mentor outside urology for institutional perspective, and subspecialty mentors for society navigation.[5]

Coaching has the strongest randomized evidence of the three:

  • Surgeons. In a randomized trial of 80 surgeons, six monthly sessions with a professional coach reduced overall burnout (2.5% decrease compared with a 2.5% increase in controls; difference −5.0%, 95% CI −8.6% to −1.4%) and improved resilience. Burnout returned toward baseline 6 months after coaching ended, while resilience continued to improve.[8]
  • Physicians in practice. In a pilot randomized trial of 88 physicians in medicine, family medicine and pediatrics, the absolute rate of overall burnout fell by 17.1 percentage points in the coaching arm and rose by 4.9 percentage points in controls at 5 months; no statistically significant between-group differences were observed in depersonalization or job satisfaction.[9]
  • Group and peer formats. A 6-month online group-coaching program reduced emotional exhaustion and impostor-syndrome scores among 101 female residents, 19 of them from surgical specialties.[10] Six sessions with professionally trained physician peer coaches reduced burnout and interpersonal disengagement in a randomized trial of 138 physicians.[11]
  • Pooled evidence. A 2026 meta-analysis of 93 randomized and 6 cluster-randomized trials concluded that professional coaching probably reduces burnout among physicians (depersonalization SMD −0.30, moderate certainty; emotional exhaustion SMD −0.37, low certainty), particularly when sustained for more than 4 weeks. Most included trials were unblinded with subjective outcomes.[12]

The manual lists cost, time, fit with the coach and unrealistic expectations as the practical limits. Many coaches offer a free introductory session to assess fit, and coaches completing certification hours may offer reduced-fee coaching.[5]

Building a Reconstructive Referral Base​

Reconstructive and functional practices are built largely on referral. Complex stricture, fistula, mesh complications, prosthetic revision and neurogenic bladder often reach the reconstructive surgeon after another clinician has tried first, so the referral network is the practice. The transition manual's recommendations, applied to that setting:[5]

  • Clinical care first. Safe, well-communicated care is the basis of every referral; speed comes with experience.
  • Meet referring clinicians in person. Hospitalist-based inpatient care has reduced informal contact with primary care, so introductions often have to be arranged, through the practice manager, a hospital physician liaison or direct visits. For a reconstructive practice the list extends to general urologists, gynecologists, colorectal surgeons, radiation oncologists, and physical medicine and spinal-cord-injury teams. Direct contact details help only if the surgeon answers them.
  • Build and teach the team. Everything that happens to a patient under the surgeon's care reflects on the surgeon. The AUA position is that advanced practice providers (APPs) work in a formally defined supervisory or collaborative relationship with a urologist, with delegated autonomy growing as the team matures. APP-performed office procedures such as urodynamics and cystoscopy remain an area of controversy that depends on training, proficiency and state scope-of-practice law.
  • Visibility. Grand rounds, lunchtime talks for referring groups, patient support and advocacy groups, local media, and hospital public-relations coverage of accepted abstracts all introduce a new surgeon. Social media use must remain HIPAA compliant.
  • Academic reputation. Promotion to associate professor generally requires a regional reputation, evidenced by invited talks or a referral base, together with publications or program development in a defined area. Committee work aligned with the clinical interest, such as a hospital robotics committee or a section meeting program, builds name recognition.

Outreach clinics extend a referral base and access at the same time. In Iowa, visiting-consultant outreach clinics raised the share of residents within 30 minutes of a urologist from 57% to 84%, at a cost of 198 clinic days and 20,400 miles of urologist travel per month.[13]

Board Certification and Lifelong Learning​

  • Initial certification. The American Board of Urology (ABU) process is a written Qualifying (Part 1) examination, then a 16-month practice requirement in a single community with unrestricted licensure, practice logs and acceptable peer review, then an oral Certifying (Part 2) examination. Candidates have 6 years from the end of residency and up to three attempts at each examination; a re-entry pathway exists after a third failure.[14] A job change during the practice-requirement period should be checked against current ABU rules before it is accepted.
  • Maintenance. The ABU replaced Maintenance of Certification with Lifelong Learning in 2017.[5] Continuing Urologic Certification now provides a five-year longitudinal cycle for newly issued continuous certificates.[42] The ABU still lists Lifelong Learning Level 1 requirements, including a Practice Assessment Protocol, peer review, 90 hours of urology-focused CME (at least 30 Category 1), patient-safety videos and a professionalism and ethics module.[15] Diplomates should check their assigned pathway in the ABU portal.
  • Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS). ABU subspecialty certification requires a current ABU general certificate and completion of an ACGME-accredited URPS fellowship of at least 24 months. The examination is about 180 multiple-choice questions, with three opportunities to pass within 6 years of fellowship completion. Subspecialty certificates are time limited and subject to Lifelong Learning, and the general certificate is extended to expire with the subspecialty certificate. Fellows from programs sponsored by the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology apply through that board.[16]

Engagement and Advocacy​

Organized Urology​

The AUA runs more than 50 committees staffed by more than 500 volunteers, grouped under education, governance and publications, membership, public policy and advocacy, research, science and quality, and the Urology Care Foundation.[5] Calls for nominations usually go out in early fall for appointments beginning the following June; individuals, AUA Sections and specialty urologic societies may nominate candidates, and many early-career committee nominations and recommendations come through AUA Section boards, making section-level committee service an effective entry point.[5] Other entry points are peer review for AUA journals, the AUA Leadership Program for active AUA members 15 years or less from training, and the Holtgrewe Legislative Fellowship for AUA residents in their research year, fellows and first-year graduates.[5] Because some AUA roles are appointed through section leadership, a geographic move can end them.[5]

For the reconstructive and functional urologist and the urogynecologist, the subspecialty societies are where sponsorship, referral relationships and a national reputation are built:

SocietyDomain
SUFU (Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction)Voiding dysfunction, neurourology, female pelvic medicine, urodynamics
GURS (Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons)Urethral, genital, prosthetic and trauma reconstruction
AUGS (American Urogynecologic Society)Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery
SMSNA (Sexual Medicine Society of North America)Sexual medicine, Peyronie's disease, penile prosthetics

The transition manual notes that GURS offers involvement opportunities specifically for younger members; state and county medical societies, the AMA Young Physicians Section and the American College of Surgeons offer parallel routes into organized medicine.[5]

How Policy Reaches Practice​

Decisions by Congress, CMS, state legislatures and licensing boards reach the reconstructive surgeon as the fee-schedule conversion factor, coverage of devices and grafts, prior-authorization burden, APP scope of practice and credentialing requirements. The payment side is covered in Healthcare Finance & Payment Models. Licensing is a less obvious example. In the 2023 AUA Census (1,918 urologists, weighted for nonresponse), 45.4% reported burnout, 17% had sought professional help, and 43% said they would seek help if mental-health questions were not included in state licensure records; the authors call for removing those questions from licensing and credentialing applications.[17]

Legislative Engagement​

The AUA Public Policy Council includes committees on coding and reimbursement, federal legislative affairs, state advocacy, practice management and research advocacy.[5] The AUA also works through coalitions such as the AMA House of Delegates and the Alliance of Specialty Medicine. Its political action committee, AUAPAC, was established in 2018 and accepts donations only from domestic AUA members. The annual Urology Advocacy Summit in spring combines policy briefings with meetings with members of Congress and their staff.[5] Practical first steps for an early-career surgeon are membership in the state urological society, attendance at one advocacy day, a meeting with a legislator's district staff, and a comment on a proposed payment rule.

Workforce Dynamics​

Supply, Demand and Distribution​

  • Supply per capita. In 2019 there were 13,044 practicing urologists, or 3.99 per 100,000 persons. In a continued-growth model, urologists per capita reach a low of 3.3 per 100,000 in 2030; urologists per 100,000 persons aged 65 years or older fall from 23.8 in 2020 to 15.8 in 2035 and do not recover to baseline by 2060.[18]
  • Composition. A stock-and-flow model projected urologist full-time equivalents falling from 11,221 in 2015 to 8,859 in 2035 while the number of APPs rose from 8,710 to 15,369, with a projected 2035 shortage of 12% to 46% across scenarios.[19]
  • Pelvic floor demand. The number of US women with at least one symptomatic pelvic floor disorder is projected to rise from 28.1 million in 2010 to 43.8 million in 2050, including a 55% increase in urinary incontinence.[20]
  • Maldistribution. In a county-level analysis, 63% of US counties lacked a urologist. Urologists were far less likely to practice in rural counties than metropolitan counties (OR 0.03), and urologists younger than 45 years were three times less likely than older urologists to practice in nonmetropolitan or rural counties.[21]
  • Rural training. In a 2026 survey, 12 of 64 responding residency programs (18.75%) offered a non-metropolitan rotation; call coverage and resident salary support were the most common barriers.[22] Outreach clinics are the established mitigation.[13]

Reconstructive and prosthetic care is concentrated in metropolitan referral centers, so patients with stricture, fistula or device complications often travel long distances. Outreach clinics, co-management with community urologists and telehealth follow-up are the levers available to the individual surgeon.

Burnout as a Workforce Problem​

Burnout removes surgeons from a workforce that is already short. Among 1,126 practicing urologists who received and answered Maslach Burnout Inventory questions in the 2016 AUA Census, 38.8% met burnout criteria; burnout was associated with more patient visits and work hours per week and younger age.[23] An AUA Workforce Workgroup analysis of census data reported 36.7% in 2021 and 36.2% in 2016, with an increase among women from 35.3% to 49.2% between 2016 and 2021 and among urologists younger than 45 from 37.9% to 44.8%.[24] In 2023, 45.4% reported burnout.[17] Across specialties, US physicians in 2023 remained at higher risk of burnout than other US workers (OR 1.82).[25] Coaching is the intervention with the most randomized evidence (see above).

Women in Urology​

  • Growth. Women were 1,286 of 13,044 practicing urologists (9.9%) in 2019.[18] The number of women urologists is projected to grow 3.77-fold between 2020 and 2060 in a continued-growth model and to account for a large share of workforce growth.[26]
  • Compensation. In an AUA survey (848 responses, 13% response rate), an adjusted model of 693 respondents associated female gender with $76,321 less annual compensation after accounting for work hours, call, age, practice setting and type, fellowship training, APP employment and ancillary income; gender was not significantly associated with job satisfaction in a separate model of 733 respondents.[27]
  • Workplace experience. In AUA Census data from 2016 to 2021, women were more likely than men to report gender bias in their practice (39.3% compared with 1.2%) and limitations in seeing certain patients because of their gender (25.9% compared with 2.4%), and less likely to be satisfied with work-life balance (39.9% compared with 57.7%).[28]
  • Practice patterns. The transition manual notes that women urologists are often steered toward female patients regardless of their stated interests, and that scheduler scripts can shape a clinic's case mix. It recommends agreeing on the target patient population and the compensation for that work before signing.[5]

Workforce Diversity​

  • Pipeline attrition. The proportion of Black urology applicants fell by 0.13% per year from 2007–2008 to 2019–2020. The proportion of Black residents did not change from 2009–2010 to 2019–2020, nor did the proportion of Latinx or Hispanic residents from 2011–2012 to 2019–2020. Total residents rose from 1,043 to 1,734 between 2009–2010 and 2019–2020.[29] In 2018–2019, representation of both groups decreased step-wise at each stage from medical school application to urology faculty.[29]
  • Projection. If the current increase in graduates under-represented in medicine (URiM) of 0.145% per year continues, URiM urologists will make up 13.3% of the practicing workforce in 2061, against a projected 44.2% of the US population. An increase of 0.845 percentage points per year in the share of URiM urology residency graduates would bring the practicing workforce to 28.1% URiM by 2061 in the study model.[30]
  • Concordance. In national survey data on 50,626 adults, patient-clinician racial concordance was associated with lower total health care expenditures for Black, Asian and Hispanic patients (14%, 34% and 20% lower). The data are observational.[31]

Health Equity in Functional and Reconstructive Practice​

Healthy People 2030 distinguishes personal health literacy, an individual's ability to find, understand and use health information and services, from organizational health literacy, the degree to which an organization enables individuals to do so.[32] The second definition places part of the responsibility on the practice: its consent forms, handouts, interpreter access and scheduling.

Disparities in pelvic floor care are documented at each step from recognition to surgical route. The studies are observational and describe associations:

StepFinding
Specialist referral for OABIn 5,407 women with OAB in a racially diverse health-system cohort, Black women were less likely to consult a specialist; prescribing did not differ by race[33]
Social determinants and OAB severityIn 256 patients at two FPMRS clinics, food insecurity (OR 2.51), financial strain (OR 1.94) and difficulty finding or keeping employment (OR 3.14) were associated with worse OAB symptoms[34]
Sacral neuromodulationAmong beneficiaries with a coded potential urological indication in a 5% Medicare claims sample from 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010, minority patients had lower adjusted odds of implantation (OR 0.38)[35]
SUI surgeryAmong female Medicare beneficiaries with SUI from 1999 to 2001, White and Hispanic women were more likely than Black or Asian women to undergo a sling; among sling recipients, nonwhite women had approximately twice the adjusted odds of nonurological complications, pelvic organ prolapse, or urinary obstruction within 1 year[36]
Care-seeking barriersLatina women reported higher barriers to incontinence care after adjustment for age, income, education and severity (β = 7.4)[37]
KnowledgeAfrican American women were less likely than White women to know that exercises help leakage, that pessaries treat prolapse, and that childbirth is a risk factor[38]
Prolapse surgery outcomesIn 2003 national discharge data, complications occurred in 19.4% of White and 34.1% of Black women undergoing prolapse surgery[39]
Surgical routeAmong 10,524 abdominal sacrocolpopexies within 22,861 NSQIP apical repairs, Latina (OR 0.68) and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (OR 0.31) women were less likely than White women to have a laparoscopic rather than open approach; among all colpopexies, Black women were more likely to need transfusion (OR 3.04)[40]
Procedure choiceIn national inpatient data from 2008 to 2018, Black, Hispanic and other-race patients and Medicaid or uninsured patients had higher odds of native-tissue repair than sacrocolpopexy[41]

For the operator, these findings translate into measurable practice items: the proportion of patients offered minimally invasive OAB therapies, including sacral neuromodulation, by patient group[43], the route mix for sacrocolpopexy, interpreter use, plain-language and translated materials such as the WARWIKI patient handouts, and a referral path to social work for unmet social needs, which the authors of the social-determinants study recommend.[34] Clinical detail on the conditions is on the OAB and female SUI pages.

References​

1. Sinyard RD, Veeramani A, Rouanet E, et al. "Gaps in Practice Management Skills After Training: A Qualitative Needs Assessment of Early Career Surgeons." J Surg Educ. 2022;79(6):e151–e160. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.009

2. Tapia NM, Milewicz A, Whitney SE, Liang MK, Braxton CC. "Identifying and Eliminating Deficiencies in the General Surgery Resident Core Competency Curriculum." JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):514–8. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4406

3. Hauge LS, Frischknecht AC, Gauger PG, et al. "Web-Based Curriculum Improves Residents' Knowledge of Health Care Business." J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(6):777–83. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.011

4. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, et al. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1446-51. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427

5. AUA Young Urologists Committee. Transitioning from Residency to Practice Manual. 8th ed. Linthicum, MD: American Urological Association; 2025.

6. Gottlieb AS, Travis EL. Rationale and Models for Career Advancement Sponsorship in Academic Medicine: The Time Is Here; the Time Is Now. Acad Med. 2018;93(11):1620-1623. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002342

7. Travis EL, Doty L, Helitzer DL. Sponsorship: a path to the academic medicine C-suite for women faculty? Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1414-7. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a35456

8. Dyrbye LN, Gill PR, Satele DV, et al. Professional Coaching and Surgeon Well-being: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2023;277(4):565-571. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005678

9. Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD, Gill PR, et al. Effect of a Professional Coaching Intervention on the Well-being and Distress of Physicians: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(10):1406-1414. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2425

10. Fainstad T, Mann A, Suresh K, et al. Effect of a Novel Online Group-Coaching Program to Reduce Burnout in Female Resident Physicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5):e2210752. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10752

11. Kiser SB, Sterns JD, Lai PY, et al. Physician Coaching by Professionally Trained Peers for Burnout and Well-Being: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(4):e245645. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5645

12. Collett G, Gupta J, Eltayeb A, et al. Efficacy of Individual-Level Interventions to Mitigate the Risk for Burnout Among Health Care Professionals : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Intern Med. 2026;179(1):51-66. doi:10.7326/ANNALS-25-00469

13. Uhlman MA, Gruca TS, Tracy R, et al. Improving access to urologic care for rural populations through outreach clinics. Urology. 2013;82(6):1272-6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.053

14. American Board of Urology. Initial certification. abu.org (accessed September 2026).

15. American Board of Urology. Lifelong Learning Level 1. abu.org (accessed September 2026).

16. American Board of Urology. Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery subspecialty certification. abu.org (accessed September 2026).

17. Nam CS, Glick H, Strup S, et al. American Urological Association Workforce Task Force on Burnout and Coping. Urology. 2026;208:212-216. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2025.11.246

18. Nam CS, Daignault-Newton S, Kraft KH, et al. Projected US Urology Workforce per Capita, 2020-2060. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(11):e2133864. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33864

19. McKibben MJ, Kirby EW, Langston J, et al. Projecting the Urology Workforce Over the Next 20 Years. Urology. 2016;98:21-26. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.028

20. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, et al. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278-1283. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96

21. Odisho AY, Fradet V, Cooperberg MR, et al. Geographic distribution of urologists throughout the United States using a county level approach. J Urol. 2009;181(2):760-5; discussion 765-6. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.034

22. Deibert CM, Chung PH, Kieran K, et al. Are We Exposing Urology Residents to Rural or Non-metropolitan Practice? A Program Director Survey of Urology Residency Training. Urology. 2026;211:129-131. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2026.01.038

23. North AC, McKenna PH, Fang R, et al. Burnout in Urology: Findings from the 2016 AUA Annual Census. Urol Pract. 2018;5(6):489-494. doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2017.11.004

24. Harris AM, Teplitsky S, Kraft KH, et al. Burnout: A Call to Action From the AUA Workforce Workgroup. J Urol. 2023;209(3):573-579. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000003108

25. Shanafelt TD, West CP, Sinsky C, et al. Changes in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Integration in Physicians and the General US Working Population Between 2011 and 2023. Mayo Clin Proc. 2025;100(7):1142-1158. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.11.031

26. Nam CS, Daignault-Newton S, Herrel LA, et al. The Future is Female: Urology Workforce Projection From 2020 to 2060. Urology. 2021;150:30-34. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.043

27. Spencer ES, Deal AM, Pruthi NR, et al. Gender Differences in Compensation, Job Satisfaction and Other Practice Patterns in Urology. J Urol. 2016;195(2):450-5. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.100

28. Morin J, Ali N, North A, et al. An AUA Workforce Report: Data From the AUA Census Regarding Workplace Experiences Based on Gender. Urol Pract. 2025;12(1):3-6. doi:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000690

29. Simons ECG, Arevalo A, Washington SL, et al. Trends in the Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the US Urology Workforce. Urology. 2022;162:9-19. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.038

30. Appleton A, Black K, Sellke NC, et al. The Future State of Race/Ethnicity in Urology: Urology Workforce Projection From 2021-2061. Urology. 2024;187:39-45. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.009

31. Jetty A, Jabbarpour Y, Pollack J, et al. Patient-Physician Racial Concordance Associated with Improved Healthcare Use and Lower Healthcare Expenditures in Minority Populations. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022;9(1):68-81. doi:10.1007/s40615-020-00930-4

32. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Health literacy in Healthy People 2030. health.gov (accessed September 2026).

33. Mckellar K, Bellin E, Schoenbaum E, et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Treatment for Overactive Bladder in a Racially Diverse Population. Urology. 2019;126:70-75. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.021

34. Tellechea L, Zuo S, Kohn JR, et al. The Effect of Social Determinants of Health on Overactive Bladder Symptom Severity. J Urol. 2021;205(5):1415-1420. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001545

35. Laudano MA, Seklehner S, Sandhu J, et al. Disparities in the Use of Sacral Neuromodulation among Medicare Beneficiaries. J Urol. 2015;194(2):449-53. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.111

36. Anger JT, Rodríguez LV, Wang Q, et al. Racial disparities in the surgical management of stress incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1846-50. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.035

37. Willis-Gray MG, Sandoval JS, Maynor J, et al. Barriers to urinary incontinence care seeking in White, Black, and Latina women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(2):83-6. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000100

38. Mandimika CL, Murk W, Mcpencow AM, et al. Racial Disparities in Knowledge of Pelvic Floor Disorders Among Community-Dwelling Women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(5):287-92. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000182

39. Shah AD, Kohli N, Rajan SS, et al. Racial characteristics of women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(1):70.e1-8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.042

40. Boyd BAJ, Winkelman WD, Mishra K, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(4):405.e1-405.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.002

41. Yadav GS, Rutledge EC, Nisar T, et al. Health Care Disparities in Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Contemporary Nationwide Analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(4):207-212. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001173

42. American Board of Urology. Continuing Urologic Certification. abu.org (accessed October 2026).

43. Cameron AP, Chung DE, Dielubanza EJ, et al. "The AUA/SUFU guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder." Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(8):1742-1752. doi:10.1002/nau.25532

44. O’Rourke-Suchoff D, Hyman S, Young T, Maeder C, Dolansky MA. "Applying a Quality Improvement Framework to Operating Room Efficiency in an Academic-Practice Partnership." J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2016;23(3). Full text