Skip to main content

Female Urethroplasty

Female urethral reconstruction addresses stricture, diverticulum, prolapse, post-MUS-erosion scarring, and complete urethral loss or obliteration. No dorsal or ventral approach is universally preferred. The choice between oral-mucosal graft and vaginal-flap reconstruction depends on stricture anatomy, tissue quality and surgeon experience.[1][2]

The AUA 2023 amendment states that surgeons may reconstruct female strictures with oral mucosal grafts, vaginal flaps or a combination , and that urethroplasty should be offered because endoscopic treatment has low efficacy.[1] EAU 2026 recommends dilation to 24–41 Fr initially , repeat dilation with planned weekly intermittent self-dilation using a 16–18 Fr catheter or planned repeat dilation at first recurrence , and urethroplasty at second recurrence when self-dilation is unsuitable or definitive treatment is desired .[2] It leaves the technique to surgeon experience, graft or flap availability and the quality of the ventral versus dorsal urethra.[2] The table below lists reported options by scenario.


Decision Framework — Choosing a Female Urethroplasty​

Clinical ScenarioReconstructive optionAlternative(s)Avoid / limitations
Distal / meatal stricture (short, isolated)EAU 2026 recommends meatotomy/meatoplasty for short meatal strictures [2]Distal urethrectomy + advancement meatoplasty for selected distal-segment disease after defining proximal extent; dorsal onlay graft (BMG, labial, or lingual mucosa) when augmentation is neededRepeated dilation with curative intent
Mid-urethral stricture, healthy vaginal tissueVaginal wall flap (ventral onlay or inlay) ± Martius reinforcementDorsal onlay graft—
Mid-urethral stricture, atrophic vaginaOral mucosal graft: dorsal onlay or ventral onlay, selected by local tissue quality and surgeon experience[2][9]Buccal or lingual mucosa according to donor-site suitabilityVaginal flap / graft from atrophic tissue
Pan-urethral or long-segment strictureDefine the full extent and local tissue quality before choosing a graft/flap route; dorsal onlay graft extended through the mapped diseased segment is one option[2]Ventral onlay graft when ventral tissue is suitable; comparative female data do not establish a superior route[9]Repeated dilation with curative intent
LS-related strictureOral-mucosal graft selected by stricture extent and viable urethral tissue; dorsal onlay BMG is one option[2][14]Ventral oral-graft access may be considered when ventral tissue is suitable; female LS-specific comparative evidence is lackingAvoid diseased vaginal or labial donor tissue; the broader genital-tissue caution is based on expert extrapolation[14]
Prior MUS erosion / scarred periurethral bedDistinguish exposed mesh from a healed scar and assess the urethral defect and continence; a four-woman series of erosion-related strictures described partial mesh resection, urethral-edge debridement and primary repair[12]For a residual stricture, ventral onlay BMG with Martius reinforcement was described in 2 women with prior synthetic MUS[13]; dorsal BMG is another tissue-dependent option[2]A scarred vaginal donor bed limits flap use[2]; recurrent SUI after mesh resection occurred in 2/4 women at 16 months in the primary-repair series[12]
Complete urethral loss / obliterationVaginal-wall tubularization, with continence surgery assessed individually (pubovaginal sling was used in most patients in one mixed urethral/vesical-neck series)[10]Bladder wall flap (Tanagho or Nayyar)—
Near- or completely-obliterative stricture, urethral plate salvageableDouble-face oral mucosa inlay (posterior and anterior grafts) — selected reports—Routine use in place of standard onlay grafting
Bladder neck obliteration (post-PFUI)Bladder flap urethroplasty (anterior or posterior)Nayyar novel anterior bladder tubeRepeated endoscopic procedures
Failed prior urethroplastyRepeat urethroplasty using a graft or flap selected by available tissue and urethral anatomy[2]; BMG salvage after vaginal-flap recurrence was reported in 2 women[11]Vaginal flap (if tissue healthy); alternative graft sourceFurther dilation
First presentation, mild symptomsTrial of dilation after confirming an anatomical strictureDiscuss urethroplasty or intermittent self-dilation according to goalsTreating nonspecific LUTS without confirmed stricture

EAU 2026 describes pelvic examination to assess prolapse, masses, scars, vulvar dermatoses and atrophy; it recommends flow rate, post-void residual and voiding cystourethrogram or videourodynamics in all women with refractory lower urinary tract symptoms .[2] For a mid- or proximal-urethral stricture, assessing continence before repair is worthwhile, because the stricture itself may be helping maintain continence. A stress cystogram or videourodynamics can determine whether continence is maintained despite an open bladder neck; when it is, relieving the obstruction may unmask incontinence that needs further treatment, a possibility to discuss with the patient beforehand.[3]

For augmentation grafting, the dorsal urethrotomy is typically extended about 5 mm beyond each end of the stricture, and passage of a 30-Fr Hegar dilator under its own weight has been described as a check of adequate caliber. Graft width is planned to combine with native urethral caliber for an approximately 30-Fr lumen, allowing for about 20% graft contraction. For strictures narrower than 7 Fr, a double-faced or tubularized graft/flap approach has been described.[4]

Schematic of dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft female urethroplasty in three steps

Dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft female urethroplasty: Step 1, dorsal inverted-U incision around the meatus (10 to 2 o'clock) and dissection from dorsal attachments, preserving the lateral pubourethral ligaments and dorsal clitoral cavernosal tissue; Step 2, 12-o'clock dorsal urethrotomy and graft secured with PDS; Step 3, vaginal incision closed and meatus reapproximated to surrounding vaginal and vestibular epithelium. In the reported protocol, a capped 14-Fr urethral Foley remained for 2 weeks while an 18-Fr suprapubic catheter drained. From Higgins MM, et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023;55(5):1149-1154, Fig. 1 (CC BY 4.0).[7]

For a near- or completely-obliterative stricture with a salvageable urethral plate, a single-stage double-face oral mucosa inlay has been reported: a posterior (6 o'clock) inlay graft is placed first, and a second, anterior-wall inlay graft is placed after rotating the lumen (using a nasal speculum) to expose it. This has been described for strictures permitting only guidewire passage, below 7 Fr, or complete obliteration with suprapubic-catheter dependence. The original technical report described a single case.[5][6] In a two-centre retrospective series of 42 female urethroplasties (mean follow-up 27 months for the full cohort), 8 were double-face repairs and 7 of 8 met the study’s reported success endpoint; one distal double-face repair required further treatment.[8] It remains a selected option rather than a routine standard, distinct from Palminteri's earlier male perineal double-BMG operation.[5]

Intraoperative views of ventral inlay and double-face buccal mucosal graft female urethroplasty

Ventral inlay and double-face female urethroplasty: (A) ventral urethrotomy (yellow arrow) with the buccal mucosal graft prepared for parachuting into it; (B) graft inlaid into the ventral urethra, with sutures at the lateral borders of the urethrotomy and the metal edge anteriorly; (C) double-face technique, ventral inlay component (graft marked in yellow); (D) double-face technique, completed dorsal inlay graft (marked in yellow). From Bain M, et al. BJUI Compass. 2025;6(5):e70024, Figure 3 (CC BY 4.0).[8]


Technique Database​

19 of 19 techniques
TechniqueBest For
Endoscopic / Minimally Invasive
Female DVIU and Urethral DilationDilation for selected confirmed strictures; female DVIU evidence is limited
Distal Urethrectomy + Meatal Advancement
Distal Urethrectomy with Advancement MeatoplastyShort distal / meatal stricture
Flap Urethroplasty
Blandy U-Flap Vaginal Flap UrethroplastyMid-urethral stricture, healthy vagina
Lateral-Based Anterior Vaginal Wall FlapMid / distal stricture; preserves orthotopic meatus
Anterior Vaginal Wall Mucosal Inlay (Önol)Mid-urethral stricture; pedicled anterior vaginal-wall mucosal inlay
Dorsal Vaginal Flap UrethroplastyDorsal augmentation when oral mucosa unavailable
Labia Minora Pedicled FlapSelected reconstruction with healthy labial tissue; avoid diseased donor tissue
Bladder Wall Flap UrethroplastyTotal urethral loss / obliterative bladder-neck contracture
Free Graft Urethroplasty
Female Dorsal Onlay UrethroplastyDorsal graft option selected by anatomy and tissue quality
Female Ventral Onlay BMG UrethroplastyMid-urethral stricture; meatus preservation; requires vaginal dissection
Female Ventral Inlay BMG UrethroplastyVaginal-sparing graft option in selected anatomy
Female Dorsal Inlay BMG UrethroplastyFemale urethral stricture; transurethral inlay approach
Circular (Circumferential) BMGSevere distal circumferential stricture (salvage)
Combined / Hybrid Techniques
Combined Vaginal Flap + BMGComplex stricture; one tissue source insufficient
Staged BMG Urethroplasty (Female)Salvage for obliterative disease (rarely needed)
Urethral Loss / Obliteration Repair
Primary End-to-End Anastomosis (Female)Acute female PFUI; short obliterative defect
Vaginal Wall Tubularization UrethroplastyTotal / near-total urethral loss
Other Female Reconstructive Procedures
Urethral Diverticulum RepairSymptomatic urethral diverticulum
Urethral Prolapse RepairRefractory / thrombosed urethral prolapse

References​

1. Wessells H, Morey A, Souter L, et al. Urethral stricture disease guideline amendment (2023). J Urol. 2023;210:64–71. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000003482.

2. European Association of Urology. Urethral Strictures: Disease Management in Females. 2026. Official guideline.

3. Lec P, Nitti VW. Female urethral reconstruction. In: Smith JA Jr, Dmochowski RR, Thomas JC, Preminger GM, eds. Hinman's Atlas of Urologic Surgery. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2025:686.

4. Nayyar R, Kumar P, Uppal Nayyar B. Dorsal (anterior) onlay urethroplasty for female urethral stricture. In: Khattar N, Nayyar R, Panda A, eds. Female Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Urethral Reconstruction. Springer; 2021:162-166.

5. Joshi PM, Kulkarni SB. A new technique of double-face buccal graft urethroplasty for female urethral strictures. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(2):165-168. doi:10.5152/tud.2019.19228.

6. Harrison W, Joshi S, Desai D. Female double-face oral mucosa urethroplasty. In: Joshi PM, Aubé-Peterkin M, Kulkarni SB, Datar G, eds. Surgical Atlas of Urethroplasty. Springer; 2024:36-39.

7. Higgins MM, Wengryn D, Koslov D, Oliver J, Flynn BJ. Female urethroplasty with dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft: a single institution experience. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023;55(5):1149-1154. doi:10.1007/s11255-023-03520-5.

8. Bain M, Gomez Zapata DE, Ravichandran K, et al. Female urethral stricture: a multi-centre experience and lessons learnt. BJUI Compass. 2025;6(5):e70024. doi:10.1002/bco2.70024.

9. Ortac M, Ozervarli MF, Ergul RB, et al. "Comparing ventral and dorsal oral mucosal graft urethroplasty in female urethral stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis." World J Urol. 2025;43(1):397. doi:10.1007/s00345-025-05773-4

10. Blaivas JG, Heritz DM. "Vaginal flap reconstruction of the urethra and vesical neck in women: a report of 49 cases." J Urol. 1996;155(3):1014-1017. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66372-9

11. Blaivas JG, Santos JA, Tsui JF, et al. "Management of Urethral Stricture in Women." J Urol. 2012;188(5):1778–1782. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.042.

12. Waterloos M, et al. "Female Urethroplasty: Outcomes of Different Techniques in a Single Center." J Clin Med. 2021;10(17):3950. doi:10.3390/jcm10173950

13. Önol FF, et al. "Techniques and Results of Urethroplasty for Female Urethral Strictures: Our Experience with 17 Patients." Urology. 2011;77(6):1318-1324. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.017

14. Waterloos M, Verla W. "Female Urethroplasty: A Practical Guide Emphasizing Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Female Urethral Stricture Disease." Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:6715257. doi:10.1155/2019/6715257