Lotus Petal Flap Urethroplasty
The lotus petal flap uses one or bilateral pedicled fasciocutaneous flaps from the gluteal fold (perineal crease) based on perforators of the internal pudendal artery, in a petal-like configuration that provides vascularized tissue for perineal coverage. Yii and Niranjan described lotus petal flaps in 1996 for vulvovaginal reconstruction,[1] and male-perineal coverage extrapolates regional flap principles. The related pudendal-thigh flap was described by Wee and Joseph for vaginal reconstruction in three patients.[2] One or two flaps are designed according to defect size and donor-site laxity.
For flap anatomy and broader applications, see Lotus Petal Flap (foundations).
Indications
In male urethral reconstruction, reported lotus-petal use is limited to selected high-risk primary or revision perineal urethrostomy, including a very short proximal urethral stump.[5] Anatomy and the broader vulvoperineal evidence are on the foundations lotus petal flap page.
| Scenario | Why lotus petal helps |
|---|---|
| Complex perineal urethral reconstruction with skin / soft-tissue loss | Brings vascularized gluteal-fold fasciocutaneous tissue into a hostile perineum |
| Panurethral or staged salvage when local penile / scrotal skin is poor | Potential regional soft-tissue coverage without free-tissue transfer; the cited urethral outcomes are limited to three high-risk perineal urethrostomies.[5] |
| Scrotal tissue loss after necrotizing fasciitis | A case report describes lotus petal flaps for neoscrotal coverage.[6] |
| Need for pliable, hidden-scar coverage | Gluteal-fold donor site closes primarily and hides in the crease |
| Perineal urethrostomy as the definitive channel, not just coverage | A specialist technique tubularizes an islanded flap to form the neourethral circumference itself when native urethral length is extremely short.[3] Check whether skin entering the urinary lumen bears hair; EAU 2026 recommends against hair-bearing perineal or scrotal flaps unless no other option is feasible .[4] |
Technique Overview
The flap is designed along the gluteal fold or perineal crease over the internal-pudendal-artery perforator territory. It can be advanced, transposed, or used as a propeller-style fasciocutaneous flap depending on defect geometry. In the reported three-patient perineal-urethrostomy series, the flap formed the urethrostomy inset; one islanded flap was tubularized to bridge an extremely short urethral stump.[5]
Key Steps
- Define the urethral repair first: graft, staged plate, perineal urethrostomy, or fistula closure.
- Identify internal-pudendal perforators with handheld Doppler, spatulate the viable proximal urethra, and measure the skin-to-urethra distance. Map the deficit and decide whether one or bilateral lotus petals will permit tension-free inset.[5]
- Design the flap in the gluteal fold so the donor scar remains hidden and closure is tension-free.
- Raise the fasciocutaneous flap with enough perforator-bearing tissue to protect vascularity.
- Rotate / advance the flap into the perineal defect without kinking the pedicle.
- Inset around the urethral reconstruction without compressing the new lumen.
- Drain dead space and protect the repair with urinary diversion appropriate to the urethral operation.
In a described perineal-urethrostomy application, internal-pudendal perforators are mapped with a handheld Doppler, the urethra is debrided to viable tissue and calibrated to passage of a 30-F bougie, and the supra-fascial flap is raised from distal to proximal. A posterior skin bridge may be left, or the flap can be islanded and, in extreme shortage of native urethral length, tubularized to form the neourethral circumference. Inset uses interrupted 4-0 Vicryl from the proximal urethra, progressing laterally from 3 toward 9 o'clock, with the donor site closed over a suction drain; in the authors' own postoperative protocol, the catheter is removed at three weeks.[3]
Operative Risks
Perforator dissection can be technically challenging, and trauma may injure the vascular pedicle; the three-patient series reported no complications.[5] When flap skin lines the urinary channel, hair-bearing skin is associated with hairballs and chronic infection. The EAU urethral-stricture guideline recommends against hair-bearing perineal or scrotal flaps unless no other option is feasible .[4]
Outcomes & Evidence
Most outcome data come from vulvar, ELAPE, and perineal reconstruction rather than urethroplasty-specific series.[1] Yii and Niranjan reported 13 lotus petal flaps without flap loss, including eight flaps in four patients after radical vulvectomy.[1] In Reilly and colleagues’ three-patient, high-risk perineal urethrostomy series, all three patients voided continently without instrumentation or revision at 22–29 months; flexible cystoscopy at 6–9 months confirmed patency. One flap was islanded and tubularized.[5] Urethral outcomes still depend on the underlying urethral reconstruction: graft take, fistula closure, stricture recurrence, and urinary diversion strategy.
See Also
- Lotus Petal Flap
- Singapore / Pudendal-Thigh Flap
- Propeller Flap
- Scrotal Flap Reconstruction
- Propeller Flap Urethroplasty
References
1. Yii NW, Niranjan NS. "Lotus petal flaps in vulvo-vaginal reconstruction." Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49(8):547–54. doi:10.1016/s0007-1226(96)90132-0. PMID: 8976747
2. Wee JTK, Joseph VT. "A new technique of vaginal reconstruction using neurovascular pudendal-thigh flaps: a preliminary report." Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(4):701–9. doi:10.1097/00006534-198904000-00018. PMID: 2648427
3. Chee J, Chauhan A. Lotus Petal Flap. In: Joshi PM, Aubé-Peterkin M, Kulkarni SB, Datar G, eds. Surgical Atlas of Urethroplasty. Springer; 2024:325-329. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-5196-9_32
4. EAU Guidelines Office. "EAU Guidelines on Urethral Strictures: Tissue Transfer." EAU Guidelines. 2026, §9.2. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urethral-strictures/chapter/tissue-transfer
5. Reilly DJ, Sham EK, Chee JBL, Chauhan A. "A novel application of the lotus petal flap in high-risk perineal urethrostomy: principles and outcomes." Australas J Plast Surg. 2018;1(1):169–175. doi:10.34239/ajops.v1i1.17
6. Payne CE, Williams AM, Hart NB. "Lotus petal flaps for scrotal reconstruction combined with Integra resurfacing of the penis and anterior abdominal wall following necrotising fasciitis." J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(3):393–397. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.015